Vents MagaZine Music and Entertainment Magazine
Related Articles
A distressed investor’s funds were taken for a Lombok development under PT Bali Real Estate Investments and diverted to an entirely different Bali project. McIntyre then published the investor’s private home address from the contract online. The audit is complete. The bank records have been handed over. Jamie McIntyre is the one with questions to answer.
The balieyewitnessnews.com article published on 15 March 2026 — on a fake media outlet operated by Jamie McIntyre himself — makes dramatic claims about blackshirt gangs, biker threats, and WhatsApp intimidation. Buried inside it is a real investor named Jaxon who is texting in distress about the dispute.
What the article does not tell you is who Jaxon is, why he is in distress, what he actually paid for, where his money went, and how McIntyre responded to his distress — by publishing his private home address from a confidential contract on a public website.
Jaxon purchased a villa in Lombok under PT Bali Real Estate Investments — Jamie McIntyre’s registered Indonesian entity. He paid $180,000. The villa has not been built. The money was not applied to the Lombok development. It was used by McIntyre for a separate development in Bali.
Jaxon is not angry at Kinnara. He is not angry at Adrian Campbell. He is angry at Jamie McIntyre — the man who took his money, promised him a villa in Lombok, diverted his funds to an entirely different project in Bali, built nothing, and has been hiding and dodging his attempts to get answers ever since.
That is the story this article conceals.
Where Jaxon’s Money Actually Went
Jaxon’s purchase was made under PT Bali Real Estate Investments — the registered Indonesian entity behind McIntyre’s Lux Projects Bali and Lux Property Group operation. His contract was for a villa development in Lombok.
The funds were not applied to the Lombok development. Official bank records provided by Christina Natalia — the sitting Indonesian director of PT Bali Real Estate Investments — confirm that funds received for the Lombok project were applied to a separate development in Bali. A different project, a different location, an entirely different purpose to the one contracted. Jaxon did not consent to this. He did not know about it. He found out when he started asking why his villa was not being built.
⚠ This is not a disputed allegation. It is documented in official bank records provided by the director of the entity that received the funds. Jaxon’s $180,000 was contracted for a Lombok villa under PT Bali Real Estate Investments. The bank records show those funds were applied to a Bali project instead. That is misappropriation of client funds — confirmed by the company’s own financial records.
This is consistent with the pattern documented by Christina Natalia, the sitting Indonesian director of PT Bali Real Estate Investments, who stated in TechBullion in March 2026 that company account balances had at certain points been only in the thousands of Australian dollars and that significant financial pressures were affecting the business. Construction funding difficulties and contractor payment disputes had progressed to court. Natalia subsequently filed formal reports against McIntyre.
It is also consistent with the enforcement action by Satpol PP Badung in December 2025, which stopped McIntyre’s Kerobokan Kelod construction project after confirming it had no building permits — suggesting that projects are being progressed without proper authorisation and without the financial foundation they were sold to investors as having.
McIntyre Published Jaxon’s Private Home Address From the Contract
🚨 Jamie McIntyre published the private residential address of a client obtained from a confidential purchase contract in a public article on balieyewitnessnews.com. This is a serious breach of privacy law and potentially a criminal matter.
A client’s home address obtained through a property purchase contract is personal information provided in confidence for the specific purpose of that transaction. Publishing it publicly — particularly in an article that discusses the client by name in the context of a heated financial dispute — constitutes:
- A likely breach of the Australian Privacy Act 1988 — which prohibits the use or disclosure of personal information for purposes other than those for which it was collected, and applies to Australian individuals and entities handling personal data
- A likely breach of Indonesian Personal Data Protection Law — UU PDP No. 27/2022 — which came into force in 2024 and prohibits the processing or disclosure of personal data without consent, with penalties of up to 6 years imprisonment and fines of up to IDR 6 billion for criminal violations
- A potential breach of contractual confidentiality — client details in purchase contracts are not provided for public disclosure
- Targeted harassment — publishing a distressed client’s home address in a public article, in the context of a financial dispute in which the client is a victim, is precisely the kind of conduct the eSafety Commissioner’s adult cyber abuse provisions were designed to address
Jaxon is already in distress as an investor who has lost $180,000 and cannot get answers. Publishing his home address on a public website without his consent compounds that harm and raises an entirely separate and serious legal issue for McIntyre.
✓ Jaxon should immediately report the publication of his address to the Australian Information Commissioner (oaic.gov.au) and to the eSafety Commissioner (esafety.gov.au/report) as a targeted privacy breach. Screenshots of the article should be archived immediately before any takedown.
On the Blackshirt Allegations and the WhatsApp Fabrication
The article claims threatening WhatsApp messages were sent and identifies the origin of those messages as Thailand based on WhatsApp data.
This is technically illiterate and deliberately misleading. WhatsApp does not reveal the location of a sender. It is end-to-end encrypted and provides no geographical origin data whatsoever to the recipient. The claim that a message ‘appeared to originate from Thailand’ based on WhatsApp is simply false — WhatsApp cannot tell you where a message was sent from. McIntyre either does not understand how the platform works or is deliberately misrepresenting it to manufacture a false connection to a specific person.
⚠ WhatsApp is end-to-end encrypted. It does not show where a message was sent from. Claiming WhatsApp data reveals a sender’s location is false. This is a lie about how a widely used platform works, published as fact on a fake news site with no journalist and no editorial standards.
The messages come from an anonymous account called ‘Jay Dee’ registered to an Australian number. No evidence connects these messages to any specific individual beyond McIntyre’s own assertion. No police report has been filed. No independent forensic analysis has been produced. An anonymous WhatsApp account proves nothing about its sender.
On the Demand for Bank Statements
The article claims McIntyre’s legal team has repeatedly requested bank statements and financial records from Kinnara and that these requests have been ignored. This framing is misleading on two counts.
First: financial records in a legal dispute are produced through courts and formal legal process — not delivered on demand to the opposing party via WhatsApp. Kinnara cooperates fully with every legitimate legal and regulatory authority that requests documentation through proper channels.
Second: Kinnara’s accounts have already been independently audited. The audit covers all funds managed in connection with the Marina Bay City development. No discrepancy, misappropriation, or irregularity of any kind was identified. Additionally, Christina Natalia has handed over bank records to relevant authorities as part of the formal reporting process. The transparency McIntyre claims to be demanding already exists — through proper legal channels, not through fake news sites.
Jaxon’s Statement
“All I want is my villa built or my money back. I paid Jamie McIntyre $180,000 in good faith for a villa in Lombok under PT Bali Real Estate Investments. Nothing has been built. The official bank records provided by the company’s own director show the funds were not applied to my Lombok villa. I cannot get a straight answer. I cannot get a response. Jamie is hiding and dodging everyone who is trying to get answers. And now he has published my private home address from my contract on a public website without my permission. Kinnara has a completed audit. Christina handed over the bank records. Jamie McIntyre is the one who needs to answer questions — not Adrian Campbell.”
— Jaxon, Lux Projects Bali investor
Kinnara’s Position
Kinnara’s accounts are independently audited. No adverse court finding, regulatory action, or audit determination has been made against Kinnara or Adrian Campbell in any jurisdiction. Christina Natalia has filed formal reports against McIntyre and provided bank records to relevant authorities. Active legal proceedings have been commenced by Kinnara and PT Marina Bay Group against McIntyre’s entities.
✓ The only authorised Marina Bay City development website is www.marinabaycity.com — backed by audited accounts, active trademark filings, and the documented legal position of the legitimate development partners.
Sources: Official bank records of PT Bali Real Estate Investments provided by director Christina Natalia. PT Marina Bay Group official statement, December 2025 (marinabaycity.com). Independent audit of Kinnara accounts. Christina Natalia formal reports, March 2026 (TechBullion, Aftab Ahmad, 11 March 2026). Satpol PP Badung enforcement action, December 2025 (Bali Terkini, 12 January 2026). ASIC v McIntyre [2016] FCA 1276. Case 1536/Pdt.G/2025/PN Dps, Denpasar District Court. Australian Privacy Act 1988. Indonesian Personal Data Protection Law UU PDP No. 27/2022.
Kinnara Limited | kinnara.asia | marinabaycity.com | March 2026
